The Unwaivable Shield: How the Securities Act's Anti-Waiver Provision Protects Investor Rights

One of the very basic functions and purposes of securities law is protecting investor rights. At the heart of this protection lies the Securities Act's anti-waiver provision, a powerful and far-reaching rule that ensures investors and practitioners alike can rely on federal securities laws and FINRA regulations—no matter what a contract might say. This provision, reinforced by FINRA rules and regulatory notices, stands as an unyielding shield against attempts by brokerage firms to sidestep legal obligations. Whether you're a legal practitioner advising clients or an investor seeking justice, understanding the broad and definitive reach of this provision is essential. In this post, we’ll dive into its significance, explore how FINRA echoes its importance, and explain why it matters to you.

The Securities Act's Anti-Waiver Provision: A Bedrock of Investor Protection

The anti-waiver provision, enshrined in Section 29(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,[1] is clear and uncompromising: any condition, stipulation, or provision that binds someone to waive compliance with the Act, its rules, regulations, or those of a self-regulatory organization (like FINRA) is void. In plain language, no contract can strip away your rights under federal securities laws or FINRA rules. This broad reach ensures that attempts to dodge accountability—whether through cleverly worded agreements or fine print—are legally unenforceable.

Why is this so critical? The provision’s purpose is to safeguard investors and maintain the integrity of the securities market. For example, a brokerage firm might try to include a clause in a customer agreement waiving your right to FINRA arbitration or other legal remedies. Thanks to the anti-waiver provision, such clauses are invalid, preserving your ability to seek justice. Its definitive scope leaves no room for negotiation: compliance with securities laws and FINRA rules is non-negotiable.

Courts Have Uniformly Upheld the Supremacy of the Securities Act Anti-Waiver Provision

Court across the county have upheld the applicability and controlling nature of the Securities Act’s Anti-Waiver provision.  Two such cases are Milliner v. Mutual Securities, Inc.[2] and MBI Acquisition Partners, L.P. v. Chronicle Publishing Co.[3]

In Milliner v. Mutual Securities, Inc., the court upheld the anti-waiver provision of the Securities Exchange Act, ruling that a broker-dealer could not use contractual agreements to escape its supervisory obligations under FINRA rules. The court directly cited Section 29(a), stating, "Any condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person to waive compliance with any provision of this chapter or of any rule or regulation thereunder, or of any rule of a self-regulatory organization, shall be void." Reinforcing this, the court declared, "The words of § 78cc are clear: any agreement releasing a broker-dealer from complying with its obligations under FINRA rules is void as a matter of law." This decision affirmed that the anti-waiver provision protects regulatory duties, ensuring they cannot be contracted away, thus safeguarding investors.

In MBI Acquisition Partners, L.P. v. Chronicle Publishing Co., the court invoked the anti-waiver provision to prevent contractual clauses from undermining federal securities claims related to alleged fraud in a stock purchase. Citing Section 29(a), the court noted that it "forbids enforcement of agreements that waive compliance with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act." The court further held that enforcing the contract’s "survival" and "representations and warranties" clauses would "weaken the plaintiff’s ability to recover under the Exchange Act," rendering them void as to the federal claims. This ruling upheld the anti-waiver principle by ensuring that contractual terms cannot diminish the protections afforded by securities laws.

FINRA Rules and Regulatory Notices: Echoing the Anti-Waiver Mandate

FINRA, as the securities industry’s primary self-regulatory organization, amplifies the anti-waiver provision’s reach through its rules and regulatory notices. FINRA’s mission is to protect investors and ensure fair practices, and it consistently reinforces that its rules cannot be undermined by contractual agreements.

For example, FINRA Regulatory Notice 16-25[4] addresses forum selection provisions and firmly states that customers retain the right to request arbitration at FINRA’s forum—regardless of any contract specifying a different dispute resolution process. FINRA drives the point home: “FINRA rules are not mere contracts that member firms and associated persons can modify.” This echoes the Securities Act’s stance, emphasizing that investor protections are unwaivable.

Similarly, FINRA Regulatory Notice 21-16 tackles predispute arbitration agreements, declaring that these cannot include terms that contradict FINRA rules. Attempts to shorten statutes of limitations, restrict claim filings, or even seek indemnity from customers for a firm’s own violations are off-limits. FINRA deems such overreaches not just invalid but also unethical under FINRA Rule 2010, which demands high standards of commercial honor.  Specifically, FINRA stated:

In addition, a well-developed line of case law has held that it is contrary to public policy for a person to seek indemnity from a third party for that person’s own violation of the federal securities laws.  Accordingly, FINRA believes that it would be unethical and not in compliance with FINRA Rule 2010 for a member firm or associated person to attempt to seek indemnity from customers of costs or penalties resulting from the firm’s or associated person’s own violation of the securities laws or FINRA rules.[5]

These notices aren’t outliers—they reflect a consistent FINRA position that aligns seamlessly with the Securities Act’s anti-waiver provision. Together, they create a robust framework where investor rights and regulatory compliance stand firm against improper contractual workarounds.

Why This Matters to Investment Loss Clients

If you’re an investment loss client, this provision empowers you. Been told you’ve signed away your rights? Think again—under federal law, those waivers are void. Imagine discovering your brokerage engaged in misconduct that led to significant losses, only to find a contract clause blocking your path to arbitration. The anti-waiver provision steps in, ensuring you can still pursue remedies like FINRA arbitration. Knowledge of this unwaivable shield can be your first line of defense against unfair practices.

Contact Us: Protecting Your Rights Starts Here

The Securities Act’s anti-waiver provision, bolstered by FINRA rules and notices, is a cornerstone of investor protection. Its broad and definitive reach ensures that your rights remain intact, no matter the fine print. If you’ve suffered investment losses or suspect your rights under securities laws have been compromised, don’t wait. Contact Daren A. Luma, PLLC today for expert guidance. Our seasoned team specializes in securities law and is ready to fight for the justice you deserve. Reach out now—your unwaivable rights are worth defending.

CONTACT US

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance tailored to your situation.

[1] 15 U.S.C. §78cc (a).

[2] 207 F. Supp. 3d 1060, 1070 (N.D. Cal. 2016).

[3] 2001 U.S. Dist. Lexis 15387 (W.D. Wis. 2001).

[4] FINRA Regulatory Notice 16-25, (July 22, 2016).

[5] FINRA Regulatory Notice 21-16, (April 21, 2021) (emphasis added).